Coinpaper 2026-04-20 11:52:24

Ripple CTO Explains Why RLUSD Takes a Security-First Route as KelpDAO’s Easy Setup Backfires

Ripple’s RLUSD Takes the Security-First Route as KelpDAO’s Easy Bridge Design Backfires Security doesn’t make headlines, until something breaks. That’s the hard lesson highlighted by market analyst Diana, who pointed to a stark divide between Ripple’s stablecoin strategy and a costly failure elsewhere in DeFi. Ripple CTO David Schwartz has made it clear that when building RLUSD, the priority wasn’t speed or simplicity, it was security and risk control, first and always. Schwartz has challenged a popular narrative around cross-chain risk, arguing that the technology itself isn’t the weak link. Most bridging systems, he pointed out, are designed with strong security frameworks. The real danger emerges when teams deliberately dial back those protections to prioritize speed or user convenience. In those moments, efficiency comes at a cost, and when things go wrong, the consequences can be severe. Take the KelpDAO incident as a clear example. Built on LayerZero, the system was configured with a 1-of-1 Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN), effectively collapsing verification into a single checkpoint. Well, this design choice created a critical single point of failure. Exploiting it, attackers spoofed a message, minted fake rsETH, and drained roughly $292 million. What stands out is that the underlying system wasn’t inherently flawed. The safeguards existed, the problem was that they weren’t properly configured or fully enforced. Ripple’s RLUSD Bets on Security Over Speed—And It’s Already Paying Off Ripple’s RLUSD takes a fundamentally different approach. Rather than depending on conventional cross-chain bridges, it’s issued natively on both the XRP Ledger and Ethereum, removing an entire layer of bridging risk from the foundation. For broader interoperability, Ripple leverages Wormhole’s Native Token Transfers (NTT), a framework built to preserve tight control over token issuance while enforcing multi-layer verification. The strategy is deliberate: limit exposure, validate every movement, and reduce attack surfaces at every step. Therefore, KelpDAO chose speed, simplicity, and low cost, and absorbed the consequences. RLUSD takes the opposite path, prioritizing finality and institutional-grade security, even at the expense of short-term convenience. That discipline is already paying off. RLUSD has been approved as futures collateral on Bitrue, giving traders a more capital-efficient way to deploy liquidity. Furthermore, discussions around integrating RLUSD into the Mastercard ecosystem point to a larger ambition: enabling direct settlement between traditional finance and blockchain infrastructure. In an industry often obsessed with speed and hype, Ripple is making a quieter but more durable bet, scale only works if it’s built on uncompromising security.

La maggior parte ha letto le notizie

Coinbase, Bybit said to be working together o...
2026-04-20
Ethereum drops below $2,290 support, sets up...
2026-04-20
BLOK: Still Diversified, But Bitcoin Now Matt...
2026-04-20
Unicoin Foundation Debuts, Aligning Social Im...
2026-04-20
ZachXBT asks MemeCore to explain valuation an...
2026-04-20
CoinDesk 20 performance update: AAVE price pl...
2026-04-20
Japanese banks cut SWIFT costs with Ripple te...
2026-04-20
ZachXBT Flags Kraken as Key Venue in M Token...
2026-04-20

Leggi la dichiarazione di non responsabilità : Tutti i contenuti forniti nel nostro sito Web, i siti con collegamento ipertestuale, le applicazioni associate, i forum, i blog, gli account dei social media e altre piattaforme ("Sito") sono solo per le vostre informazioni generali, procurati da fonti di terze parti. Non rilasciamo alcuna garanzia di alcun tipo in relazione al nostro contenuto, incluso ma non limitato a accuratezza e aggiornamento. Nessuna parte del contenuto che forniamo costituisce consulenza finanziaria, consulenza legale o qualsiasi altra forma di consulenza intesa per la vostra specifica dipendenza per qualsiasi scopo. Qualsiasi uso o affidamento sui nostri contenuti è esclusivamente a proprio rischio e discrezione. Devi condurre la tua ricerca, rivedere, analizzare e verificare i nostri contenuti prima di fare affidamento su di essi. Il trading è un'attività altamente rischiosa che può portare a perdite importanti, pertanto si prega di consultare il proprio consulente finanziario prima di prendere qualsiasi decisione. Nessun contenuto sul nostro sito è pensato per essere una sollecitazione o un'offerta