The US Securities and Exchange Commission has issued new guidance on how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, while former SEC Commissioner Paul Atkins described the move as an early step rather than a final framework. Atkins said the interpretation is “a beginning, not an end,” signaling that the agency’s latest position does not settle broader regulatory questions. Instead, it sets initial boundaries for how crypto assets may be classified under existing law. The guidance comes as US regulators face pressure to clarify oversight across digital assets, especially as market participants seek clear rules instead of case-by-case enforcement actions. SEC crypto interpretation defines asset categories The SEC’s interpretation focuses on applying current securities laws to crypto rather than introducing new legislation. It outlines when a digital asset may qualify as a security and when it may fall outside that scope. According to the framework, tokenized versions of traditional securities fall clearly under SEC jurisdiction. However, many other crypto assets may not meet the definition of a security, depending on how they are structured and used. The agency also introduced a classification approach that groups assets into categories such as digital commodities, stablecoins, nonfungible tokens, and digital securities. This structure aims to separate assets based on function and economic use. Atkins says crypto regulation process still evolving Atkins said the interpretation should be viewed as a starting point for a broader regulatory system. He noted that further rulemaking, public input, and coordination with other agencies will be needed to complete the framework. The SEC is expected to work alongside other regulators, including the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which may oversee assets that fall outside securities definitions. This division of responsibilities remains under development. In addition, lawmakers continue to debate market structure legislation that could reshape crypto oversight in the United States. As a result, the current guidance does not finalize regulation but instead begins a longer process of defining how digital assets will be governed.
