COINPURO - Crypto Currency Latest News logo COINPURO - Crypto Currency Latest News logo
Invezz 2026-04-21 05:24:17

Arbitrum freezes $71M ETH in Kelp DAO hack as DeFi fallout grows

Arbitrum has frozen over $71 million in ETH tied to the Kelp DAO exploit in a bid to mitigate losses. According to a Tuesday update shared by Arbitrum, the network’s Security Council seized 30,766 ETH from an address on Arbitrum One linked to the weekend attack and transferred it into a frozen intermediary wallet. Arbitrum said the action was carried out without disrupting the network or affecting user activity. The funds will remain locked unless governance approves any further steps. “The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications,” the team said. Saturday’s breach targeted Kelp DAO’s LayerZero-powered bridge, where attackers drained 116,500 rsETH valued at roughly $292 million, making it one of the largest DeFi exploits so far this year. Preliminary findings from LayerZero pointed to North Korea’s Lazarus Group , with the attacker reportedly compromising RPC nodes used by the decentralized verified network. Two nodes were poisoned while a third was hit with a DDoS attack, allowing a fake cross-chain message to pass verification and mint rsETH illegitimately. Part of those stolen assets later surfaced on Aave V3, where the exploiter deposited large amounts of rsETH as collateral to borrow wrapped ETH, raising concerns about potential bad debt across the protocol. Kelp DAO said it acted quickly by pausing contracts and blacklisting wallets tied to the attacker, preventing an additional 40,000 rsETH, worth about $95 million, from being drained. Dispute over security setup intensifies LayerZero has criticized Kelp DAO’s use of a 1-of-1 decentralized verified network configuration, arguing that it created a single point of failure without independent verification. “LayerZero and other external parties previously communicated best practices around DVN diversification to Kelp DAO,” the firm said, adding that the project “chose to utilize a 1/1 DVN configuration.” Kelp DAO pushed back, stating that the setup was not an independent decision but the default configuration provided. “The 1-of-1 DVN setup is the configuration documented in LayerZero’s documentation and shipped as the default for any new OFT deployment,” Kelp said, adding that the arrangement had been “affirmatively confirmed as appropriate” during earlier discussions. Aave models fallout as losses ripple across DeFi Separate risk assessments from Aave’s ecosystem partners outlined two possible outcomes depending on how losses are handled. One scenario spreads losses across all rsETH holders across chains, leading to about $123.7 million in bad debt and a roughly 15% depeg from ETH. Another scenario isolates losses to layer 2 markets such as Arbitrum and Mantle, where the impact could climb to $230.1 million. Aave noted that its treasury holds around $181 million, with additional backstops such as its Umbrella model available in certain cases. Still, the final outcome depends on how Kelp DAO accounts for the losses and adjusts its oracle pricing. Pressure has already surfaced across the protocol, with close to $10 billion in value exiting Aave since the exploit. As of the time of publication, Kelp DAO said it is still reviewing the incident and working with LayerZero, Aave, and other stakeholders on recovery plans and a path to safely resume operations. The post Arbitrum freezes $71M ETH in Kelp DAO hack as DeFi fallout grows appeared first on Invezz

가장 많이 읽은 뉴스

coinpuro_earn
면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.