In the span of a single four-hour trading window, EDGE, the native token of the EdgeX exchange, collapsed from $1.1424 to $0.6115, a decline of 46.80%. At its lowest point, the token touched $0.3208 before staging a partial rebound. Within an hour, liquidations had torn through $2.81 million in positions. Traders were wiped out on both sides. And the questions started coming fast. What Happened to EDGE And Who is Responsible? Binance market data captured the full scale of the damage. EDGE dropped nearly half its value in a single four-hour candle, with the low of $0.3208 representing a drawdown of over 70% from the session open before buyers stepped back in. For a token with thin liquidity, that kind of move does not happen by accident. Coinglass data confirms the carnage in the derivatives market. Total EDGE liquidations over the past hour reached approximately $2.81 million, $1.96 million of that coming from long liquidations, with an additional $849,280 in short liquidations. The cascade hit both directions, but leveraged longs bore the brunt of it, suggesting the initial move downward was sharp enough to trigger a wave of forced selling that amplified the decline well beyond what organic selling pressure alone could explain. EdgeX Calls it Deliberate Market Manipulation EdgeX did not stay quiet. The team issued an official statement acknowledging “sudden abnormal price volatility,” saying the team was urgently investigating the cause and would disclose progress as soon as possible. Dear edgeX Community, We want to be transparent with you: we have observed a sudden and irregular price movement of the EDGE token and are actively investigating the cause. Our team is working urgently to understand what has occurred. We will share our updates as soon as we… — edgeX (@edgeX_exchange) June 1, 2026 The language was careful but the tone was serious, this was not the kind of statement a project issues when the market simply has a bad day. A follow-up announcement from the team went further and removed any ambiguity. We want to share an update on the irregular EDGE price movement and address any concerns about platform security directly. The edgeX protocol were not compromised in any way. This was not a hack, exploit, or security breach. What we have identified so far suggests deliberate… https://t.co/BV4rTz7aa8 — edgeX (@edgeX_exchange) June 2, 2026 The edgeX protocol was not compromised in any way, the team confirmed. This was not a hack, not an exploit, and not a security breach. “What we have identified so far suggests deliberate attempts by certain external parties to manipulate the market price of EDGE,” the statement read. “This is a market integrity issue, not a platform security issue. We take it extremely seriously.” The team says it is actively investigating and working with relevant exchanges and platforms to identify the cause and pursue accountability. A comprehensive update is promised once the investigation concludes. The on-chain address flagged in connection with the incident, ethereum:0xb0076de78dc50581770bba1d211ddc0ad4f2a241, is now under scrutiny. ZachXBT Points the Finger at Insiders While EdgeX was framing this as an external attack, on-chain detective ZachXBT arrived with a different theory, and a much sharper edge. We all know edgeX supply was being controlled by a few insiders with a low float. If you care about transparency at all you will name the counterparties / MM agreements which lead to these events. pic.twitter.com/qn2LvNPg2H — ZachXBT (@zachxbt) June 2, 2026 ZachXBT publicly accused insiders of engineering the volatility, pointing directly at the structure of EDGE’s token supply as the root of the problem. His argument is straightforward: edgeX has long operated with a low circulating supply, and that supply has been concentrated in the hands of a small number of insiders. That kind of setup creates ideal conditions for price manipulation, a thin float is easy to push in either direction, and those who control supply control the narrative around price. “We all know edgeX supply was being controlled by a few insiders with a low float,” ZachXBT wrote. “If you care about transparency at all you will name the counterparties / MM agreements which lead to these events.” The demand is pointed: disclose the market-making agreements. Name the counterparties. Show exactly who was holding what and under what terms when the token moved. ZachXBT’s track record in exposing crypto manipulation schemes gives his accusations weight that is difficult for the project to dismiss, and his post has amplified the pressure on EdgeX to go beyond a general investigation statement and provide specifics. Low Float, Insider Control, and The Manipulation Playbook ZachXBT’s framing draws attention to a dynamic that is well understood in crypto but rarely spoken about openly. Projects with low circulating supply and concentrated token holdings are structurally vulnerable to, and in some cases designed for, dramatic price swings. When a small group controls the float, the line between market-making and market manipulation becomes thin. The liquidation data adds a layer to this. A $2.81 million liquidation event on a relatively obscure token in a single hour is not a small number. It suggests that leveraged traders had built up meaningful exposure to EDGE, exposure that became a mechanism for amplifying whatever price pressure was applied. Whether that pressure came from an external bad actor, as EdgeX suggests, or from insiders exploiting their own supply advantage, as ZachXBT implies, the outcome for retail traders caught in leveraged positions was the same. What Happens Next For EDGE EdgeX now faces a credibility test as much as an investigative one. The project has committed to a comprehensive update once its investigation concludes, but the crypto community, particularly after ZachXBT’s intervention, will be looking for more than a summary finding. They want names. They want the market-making agreements made public. They want to know exactly who held supply, who moved it, and under what arrangement. The token has partially recovered from its $0.3208 low, but the reputational damage lingers alongside the price chart. For a project that positions itself as an exchange, an infrastructure layer that traders are supposed to trust, a 47% crash tied to allegations of insider manipulation is not a footnote. It is a defining moment. How EdgeX responds in the coming days will determine whether this incident becomes a chapter in the project’s history or the beginning of the end of its credibility in the market. Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services. Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news !
