Bitcoinist 2026-05-31 17:30:00

Circle Blacklists Zama Protocol Address, Freezing $12.6M In User Funds – Details

Stablecoin issuer Circle has reportedly blacklisted a smart contract linked to privacy protocol Zama, freezing approximately $12.6 million in user funds. The development, first flagged by on-chain investigator ZachXBT, involves the protocol’s Confidential USDC (cUSDC) contract deployed on Ethereum seven hours before ban. The affected contract address had been publicly documented in Zama’s docs and visible on blockchain explorers, making the freeze both traceable and verifiable in real time. Zama’s Frozen Funds Draw Relationship To Overnight Finance And Legal Dispute According to further findings by ZachXBT, the freeze may be indirectly tied to recent controversy and legal issues surrounding the asset-management and yield-generating protocol Overnight Finance. Data shows that wallet address 0xf7fcc deposited roughly $12.4 million in USDC into the Zama contract on May 11, 2026. This wallet appears to be associated with Overnight Finance, which has recently been embroiled in governance tensions. Notably, token holders had alleged a possible rug pull by the development team. This resulted in a governance vote on the DeFi protocol to distribute its treasury assets. ZachXBT shared additional information suggesting that Overnight Finance is also facing a civil case in court. One of the plaintiffs in the protocol case is Patagon Management, a firm known in the DeFi space for engaging in aggressive governance strategies, such as hostile DAO takeovers/RFV raiding. While no direct causal link has been confirmed between Circle actions and these events, the overlap between legal proceedings, treasury movements, and the frozen funds has raised concerns about how interconnected DeFi protocols can expose unrelated users, i.e., Zama users in this case, to external risks. Circle’s Unilateral Action Sets Unwanted Precedent Circle’s freeze has also reignited criticism of transparency practices by centralized issuers. According to ZachXBT, the Zama team appears to have received no prior notice before the cUSDC contract was blacklisted. If confirmed, this would amplify growing concerns about unilateral enforcement actions affecting decentralized applications and their users without warning. Earlier in March 2026, Circle reportedly froze over 16 hot wallets associated with various entities without publicly explaining its rationale. The latest action, however, goes a step further by targeting a protocol-level contract where user funds are pooled, rather than isolated wallets. This distinction is significant because it raises questions about custodial risk in supposedly decentralized systems. At the time of reporting, Circle has not issued an official explanation for its unilateral action in freezing Zama’s cUSDC contract. Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from Tradingview

Most Read News

Venice Token surges 12% – Why THESE signals h...
2026-05-31
Ethereum spot ETF exits hit $712 million! Wha...
2026-05-31
Vietnam Eyes Crypto-Backed SME Loans as Circl...
2026-05-31
Coinbase Premium Index drops to -0.15 as BTC...
2026-05-31
Kraken ‘plans’ regulated perp contracts as ri...
2026-05-31
Solana drops 65 percent from its peak! What a...
2026-05-31
Trump Crypto Vision: Immigration Order and St...
2026-05-31
116,500 rsETH exploited in Aave bridge flaw,...
2026-05-31

Read the Disclaimer : All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content, including but not limited to accuracy and updatedness. No part of the content that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice meant for your specific reliance for any purpose. Any use or reliance on our content is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyse and verify our content before relying on them. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any decision. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.